The question was, “Is it okay to find another and bring them into my boudoir because my needs aren’t being served”. From a historical perspective this ideology has been inclusive of many a powerful Empires. Egyptians ancient Pharaohs practiced the same beliefs and said it was to maintain the Holy FAMS. lineage. Same was said by what is known as “Blue Bloods”, those making up Royal Heritage comin’ outta ‘Ol English Dynasties. This ushered another social constructs; “The Tale Of The Easter Bunny” of which, I have a beautiful spin.
My “YoungStar©” over heard a convo revolving around the Easter Bunny’s fabled existence and afterwards, ran off in tears. Soon after and with her crew of liked minded ones, they asked what happened to cause her to cry. She is the Apple who’s still attached to the tree and responded as expected. “Didn’t y’all know… That Bunny was caught outta bounds hopin’ down the bunny trail where he ran into the “Notorious B. Bunny” who happened to be the 1st cousin to “Jackie Rabbit” of which. Neither liked the glamorization of this Easter Bunny and quickly text another member of this remarkable extended FAM known as “ The Jackolop” who reached out to “Rogue Rabbit” kin at a distant to “Rog Rabbit” who was… Incidentally gained social exclusion from the FAM because he held a way different opinion of things created. Still, they all quickly dispatched the Easter Bunny because…”
While her crew sat their in shock because they also heard about all these evolving rabbits and knew they were media creations of huge proportions, they quickly concluded and actually secretly knew, Easter with its celebrated Bunny had to be of man’s construct too, I mean… How else would this Bunny of been able to hop down the bunny trail that “Peter” the famous Cottontail had an Exclusivity Rights of Ownership to and usually had been known to appeared on?
YoungStars’ point just as mine is. What FOLK do is usually based on what is acquired along the way. Society has demonstrated a strong will towards making all believe what is handed down is the right way and only way, so help you God! Hummm, sounds hypnotic, sorta’ controlling in order to create a position founded in a lack of resistance.
What is the true motivation to bring another into one’s “boudoir” or in the case of a male, to the outskirts of his “Man-Cave”? Oh, didn’t you know, a male true to himself won’t break the privacy code establishing the inner sanctum set in place for the creation of the Man-Cave so… No females are allowed to breach the threshold leading inside when other males can testify to the fact of said breach by a female’s presence. The point, my point, despite of what is perceived by many as ethical and legal in regards to socially accepted conditions of intimacy is. Basically a mindset built on allusions. Allusions are always references to indirect events created to establish a cultural bond, hence, Fairy Tales.
Many say The Almighty is a myth of the greatest proportions. I say, so what, merely another’s opinion which I’m cool with because on a lesser bio-level, everything has a beginning. Moms, Pops kick it between the sheets or out under the stars and… Nine months down the line out comes you. Take this as the definitive point of creation associate it with a Higher Beings possible existence and… Now you have factual source-proof larger than you of which… All life began from. The allusion came with the advancement of stupid people trying to quantify everything. Quantify in this senses equate to measuring. Measuring man and kind abilities to forecast while maintaining complete control over all they see as their dominion. But… I won’t drift and now return you back to the situation of having another to satisfy one’s needs.
To usher in someone other than the one you are with into your private domain can be seen as taboo because it is in direct opposition of what is considered acceptable. But, when who you’re with will not, cannot maintain a completion with a consistency supporting the Contract for Intimate unity probably stipulated from the beginning; what R U ‘pose to do? Grin and bare it? This is an option but one based on false assumptions. Nothin’ is false about not havin’ it your way. Smilin’ while your world is imploding around you isn’t a fundamental option where those who think are concerned.
“Forward Ho” is an abbreviated term extrapolated from Western times of past America. “Why do you talk like this using 50 dollar words to arrive at a your point, just speak English!” Thank you “me” for speaking through “you” while channeling “me”.
When anyone speaks first consideration should go to the self. Enjoying what is said by feelin’ good when those words explode from the mouth speaks to the level of pleasure sought in understanding how those conclusions have arrived from and at. Think self-esteem if you still don’t get it. Forget to make the self primary the descent into the positions of being enslaved by those around you becomes quick and absolute. And lest not forget there’s a difference between being a slave and enslaved. Me, I refuse to deliver myself to the doors of those so readily to conquer, retraining me in bondage. Just like anyone who is in a relationship, sensing entrapment by the confining projected images of what and how a relationship is to be. Selfish? No. Dealin’ from a position of what is real! Forward Ho in relations to the subject matter defined is… Explained as such in order to show the process of forward thinking. Everything in life can be advanced, ushering in change while accepting and understanding what needs to be re-arranged.
The Game, it hasn’t changed what was, still is. What will become is comin’ and don’t think it isn’t. Become a student of history and you’ll see the real with regards to life in its daily rotation. Kings, Queens from yester-years had some very different methods of maintaining who and what they were as a FAM. Was it wrong? From a pro-creation point yes because incestual relationships allow for the recessive genes to gain momentum becoming dominant making certain orifices appear where they shouldn’t be. Then again, when isolation is a part of your cultural existence, choices are limited. Resist and go into a state of abstinence and you can be sure in time a neurological circuit is gonna get blown, leading you to a certified melt-down of which… A return to a barbaric consciousness will take complete control of who you are, sending you back to basic bio-reactive conclusions.
“Whoa, way too much information cause I can’t compute. What to do what to do?”
Okay, reach out; I’ve got ‘cha. Breathe. Inhale & exhale while slowly relaxing your BP back to sustainable levels missin’ that heart attack you sense coming. Now reconsider those Nursery Rhymes. They were created to assist you during those passages in time where psychological growth had to be maintained. Expansion of the mind comes in various forms. Is the desire to bring another into your boudoir based on bio needs or is it a creation of lustful inclinations spawned by some visual stimuli captivating your senses? Also, is this want caused as a result of one’s significant others’ refusal to be responsible to what they signed up for? The reasons will be many and most will be based on outside influences.
I told ‘ya I got ‘cha and now; stop… Don’t give in to rhymes and social reasons as evidence accepted to advance you. If you want another consider before you leap what this other brings to The Dance Of Deception. Oh yes, put yourself out there minus thought and you can bet they’ll see you for what it is and not what you want it to be. Reality is… Whatever it is that’s comin’ to He or She is a situation always in flux. Figure this into your basic equation and you see that the equation has multi acceptable concluding Happy Endings… All based on your platform of, personal satisfaction.
“You make it all sound so simple”.
Real Talk, I’ve come from The Streets. The Streets is where all things defined are refined and re-packaged correctly because restraints aren’t so enforceable on this dimension. The Streets’ record based from a historical position creating my analogy confirms one conclusion; “The Streets Always Win”. You can get with whomever you seek but in the final sub-set of psycho-social inner-actions with another based on sexual activity, it won’t matter how many you’ve engaged. If and when you fail to recognize and understand you’re what you bring to the party, you will eventually become a non-entity within any party.
Psssss; Based on the title it can be said I’m saying U R all… Hos? If the shoe fits, wear it. Then there’s another metaphor I like to incorporate. ” This jacket was made by you, for you and not by me hence, not for me. You can attempt to put it on me, demand that I wear it but. This isn’t my jacket therefore I won’t wear it.” This is to say the interpretation is a solo decision. No one nor nothing should be accepted if it’s not for you.